Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Gwendolyn A. Ewing, Gwendolyn A. Ewing v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Caution
2006 D.A.R. 2339·439 F.3d 1009·97 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1224·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 5013
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 28, 200604-73237, 04-73699California3,107 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tashima, J.

The Commissioner of Internal Revenue challenges a decision of the United States Tax Court, concluding that Gwendolyn Ewing was entitled to relief under the so-called equitable innocent spouse provision of the Internal Revenue Code (“I.R.C.”), 26 U.S.C. § 6015 (f). The Commissioner further contends that the Tax Court did not have jurisdiction to review Ewing’s petition under I.R.C. § 6015(e). Ewing cross-appeals the Tax Court’s failure to order that she be granted a refund of excess taxes paid. We have jurisdiction to review decisions of the Tax Court pursuant to I.R.C. § 7482(a)(1). We conclude that the Tax Court erred in holding that it had jurisdiction because there was no deficiency asserted, as required by I.R.C. § 6015(e). We therefore reverse the decision of the Tax Court.

I

Ewing and Richard Wiwi were married in September 1995. They decided to file a joint income tax return, rather than separate returns, for 1995 because the joint return lessened their tax liability. On the return, they reported $57,373 in wages earned by Ewing as a medical technologist, $23,502 in business income earned by Wiwi, who was self-employed as a financial adviser, and $16,892 in taxes due.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.