James C. Conrad v. United States

Caution
447 F.3d 760·2006 WL 1236847·97 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2547·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 11587
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 10, 200604-15402California3,697 words

Opinion

Opinion

Goodwin, J.

After he was unsuccessfully prosecuted on charges involving an illegal gambling operation, James C. Conrad, a twenty-six-year veteran police officer, brought a Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) action against the federal government alleging false arrest, false imprisonment, abuse of process, and malicious prosecution. Conrad now appeals a summary judgment in favor of the government and a judgment on the merits in favor of the government. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

Conrad’s appeal assigns error to three rulings by the district court: (1) the summary judgment extinguishing his false imprisonment claim, (2) the findings of fact supporting the judgment that dismissed his malicious prosecution claim, and (3) the judgment dismissing his malicious prosecution claim.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

During the course of a combined investigation by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and the Fresno County Sheriffs Department, Conrad became a suspect in an alleged illegal gambling operation at a Fresno bar and grill known as the Elbow Room. During the ten months of the investigation, investigating officers came to believe that Conrad had employed his knowledge of, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.