Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
Opinion
Opinion
447 F.3d 1172 Kenneth KAMAKANA, Plaintiff-Appellee, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellant, Gannett Pacific Corporation, dba The Honolulu Advertiser, Intervenor-Appellee, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU; Lee Donohue, in his official capacity; Milton Olmos, in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellants, and Lee Donahue, individually; Milton Olmos, individually, Defendants. No. 04-15241. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued November 17, 2005. Submitted May 11, 2006. Filed May 17, 2006. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Jerold T. Matayoshi, Fukunaga, Matayoshi, Hershey & Ching, Honolulu, HI, for the defendant-appellant. Steve Frank, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, DC, for the intervenor-appellant. William J. McCorriston, McCorriston Miller Mukai MacKinnon, Honolulu, HI, for the plaintiff-appellee. Jeffrey S. Portnoy, Cades, Schutte, Fleming & Wright, Honolulu, HI, for the intervenor-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii; Leslie E. Kobayashi, Magistrate Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-00-00729-LEB. Before BEEZER, HAWKINS, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges. McKEOWN, Circuit…