Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu

Good Law
447 F.3d 1172·2006 WL 1329926·34 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1688·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 12101
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 17, 200604-15241California7,071 words

Opinion

Opinion

447 F.3d 1172 Kenneth KAMAKANA, Plaintiff-Appellee, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellant, Gannett Pacific Corporation, dba The Honolulu Advertiser, Intervenor-Appellee, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU; Lee Donohue, in his official capacity; Milton Olmos, in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellants, and Lee Donahue, individually; Milton Olmos, individually, Defendants. No. 04-15241. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued November 17, 2005. Submitted May 11, 2006. Filed May 17, 2006. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Jerold T. Matayoshi, Fukunaga, Matayoshi, Hershey & Ching, Honolulu, HI, for the defendant-appellant. Steve Frank, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, DC, for the intervenor-appellant. William J. McCorriston, McCorriston Miller Mukai MacKinnon, Honolulu, HI, for the plaintiff-appellee. Jeffrey S. Portnoy, Cades, Schutte, Fleming & Wright, Honolulu, HI, for the intervenor-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii; Leslie E. Kobayashi, Magistrate Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-00-00729-LEB. Before BEEZER, HAWKINS, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges. McKEOWN, Circuit…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.