Fields v. Palmdale School Dist. (PSD)

Good Law
447 F.3d 1187·2006 WL 1329950·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 12099
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 17, 200603-56499California1,956 words

Opinion

Opinion

447 F.3d 1187 James FIELDS; Tammany Fields; Stuart Haberman; Robert Hoaglin; Kathie Hoaglin; Vanessa Shetler, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PALMDALE SCHOOL DISTRICT (PSD); Michael Geisser; Arland Atwood, Defendants-Appellees. No. 03-56499. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 2, 2005. Opinion Filed November 2, 2005. Petition for Rehearing En Banc Filed November 23, 2005. Filed May 17, 2006. Matthew D. Staver, Erik W. Stanley, Anita L. Staver, Rena M. Lindevaldsen, and Mary E. McAlister, Liberty Counsel, Longwood, FL, for the plaintiffs-appellants. Dennis J. Walsh, Esq., Douglas Lyon, Esq., Law Offices of Dennis J. Walsh, APC, Encino, CA, for the defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-03-00457-JVS. Before DONALD P. LAY, * REINHARDT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 In light of Appellants' petition for rehearing en banc and the amici brief in support thereof, the panel has decided to consider whether to rehear the matter nostra sponte. We have unanimously determined not to do so and hereby reaffirm our decision filed on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.