Simpson v. Aol Time Warner Inc.

Bad Law
452 F.3d 1040·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 16556
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 30, 200604-55665California8,282 words

Opinion

Opinion

452 F.3d 1040 T. Jeffrey SIMPSON, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, and California State Teachers Retirement System, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AOL TIME WARNER INC.; Cendant Corporation; Richard A. Smith; L90, aka Max Worldwide; David Colburn; Eric Keller, Defendants-Appellees. No. 04-55665. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 6, 2006. Filed June 30, 2006. Joseph W. Cotchett (argued), Bruce L. Simon and Nancy L. Fineman, Cotchett, Pitre, Simon & McCarthy, Burlingame, CA, for plaintiff-appellant California State Teachers' Retirement System. Peter T. Barbur (argued), Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, New York, NY; John B. Quinn, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for defendant-appellee Time Warner Inc. Samuel Kadet, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, NY; Jeffrey Speiser, Stern & Kilcullen, Roseland, NJ, for defendants-appellees Cendant Corporation and Richard A. Smith. Carl S. Kravitz, Zuckerman Spaeder LLP, Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee David Colburn. J. Christian Word, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee Eric Keller.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.