Reno Air Racing Association, Inc. v. Jerry McCord

Good Law
452 F.3d 1126·2006 WL 1867632·65 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 826·79 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1431·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 16967
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 7, 200604-16001California6,941 words

Opinion

Opinion

McKEOWN, J.

Jerry McCord appeals the district court’s decision and final judgment following a bench trial. The district court entered an award of damages and a permanent injunction against McCord due to his infringement of two trademarks belonging to Reno Air Racing Association, Inc. (“Reno Air”), in violation of the Lanham Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051 et seq. (“Lanham Act”). In addition, the district court found McCord in civil contempt and imposed sanctions based on his violation of an ex parte temporary restraining order (“TRO”) issued the same day the complaint was filed.

This appeal highlights the sometimes routine fashion in which TROs are issued to unsuspecting parties, who, lacking fair notice of the prohibited conduct, may unwittingly invite a contempt citation. We conclude that the TRO was improvidently issued because it failed to comport with the notice and specificity provisions of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 (“Rule 65”). Consequently, we vacate and reverse the district court’s contempt finding and imposition of sanctions. We affirm the district court’s findings and judgment with respect to trademark infringement.

Background

Since 1964, Reno Air has operated the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.