In Re Iouri Mikhel, United States of America v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Iouri Mikhel Jurlius Kadamovas Petro Krylov Natalya Solovyeva, Real Parties in Interest

Good Law
26 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 761·453 F.3d 1137·70 Fed. R. Serv. 660·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 16973
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 7, 200606-73376California1,206 words

Opinion

Opinion

453 F.3d 1137 In re Iouri MIKHEL, United States of America, Petitioner, v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Respondent, Iouri Mikhel; Jurlius Kadamovas; Petro Krylov; Natalya Solovyeva, Real Parties in Interest. No. 06-73376. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. July 7, 2006. Andrea L. Russi, Assistant United States Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for petitioner United States. Dale Michael Rubin, San Marino, CA, and Richard M. Callahan, Jr., Pasadena, CA, for real party in interest Iouri Mikhel. Richard P. Lasting, Santa Monica, CA, and Sonia E. Chahin, La Canada, CA, for real party in interest Jurlius Kadamovas. George W. Buehler, Los Angeles, CA, and David R. Evans, Pasadena, CA, for real party in interest Petro Krylov. Terry J. Amdur, Pasadena, CA, and Michael M. Crain, Santa Monica, CA, for real party in interest Natalya Solovyevae. Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Dickran M. Tevrizian, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-02-00220-DT. Before MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, SIDNEY R. THOMAS, and BARRY G. SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges. OPINION AND ORDER PER CURIAM. OPINION 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.