Pebble Beach Company, a California General Partnership v. Michael Caddy, an Individual

Caution
453 F.3d 1151·2006 WL 1897091·81 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1081·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 17381
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 12, 200604-15577California4,007 words

Opinion

Opinion

Trott, J.

Pebble Beach Company (“Pebble Beach”), a golf course resort in California, appeals the dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of its complaint against Michael Caddy (“Caddy”), a small-business owner located in southern England. In addition, Pebble Beach seeks review of an order denying its request for an opportunity to conduct jurisdictional discovery. Because Caddy did- not expressly aim his conduct at California or the United States, we hold that the district court determined correctly that it lacked personal jurisdiction. Given the nature of the claims and the facts of this case, we conclude also that the district court properly exercised its discretion by denying Pebble Beach’s motion to conduct additional jurisdictional discovery. Thus, we affirm.

I

Pebble Beach is a well-known golf course and resort located in Monterey County, California. The golf resort has used “Pebble Beach” as its trade name for 50 years. Pebble Beach contends that the trade name has acquired secondary meaning in the United States and the United Kingdom. Pebble Beach operates a website located at www.pebblebeach.com.

Caddy, a dual citizen of the United States and the United Kingdom occupies and runs a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.