Ignacio v. Judges Of The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit

Good Law
453 F.3d 1160·27 A.L.R. 6th 645·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 17379
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 12, 200603-17181California2,632 words

Opinion

Opinion

453 F.3d 1160 Tevis R. IGNACIO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JUDGES OF the UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR the NINTH CIRCUIT; Mary M. Schroeder, personally and in her capacity as Chief Judge for the Ninth Circuit; Ferdinand F. Fernandez; Kim McLane Wardlaw; William A. Fletcher; Barry G. Silverman; Pamela Ann Rymer; Stephen Reinhardt; Sidney R. Thomas; Edward Leavy; Michael Daly Hawkins; Johnnie B. Rawlinson, personally and in their capacity as Circuit Judges; Judges of the United States District Court for the District of Northern California, in their capacity as Judges, Saundra Brown Armstrong, Ronald M. Whyte, Jeremy Fogel, personally and in their capacity as United States District Court Judges; United States District Court for the District of Nevada, David W. Hagen, Valerie P. Cooke, Howard D. McKibben, personally and in their capacity as United States District Court Judges; United States Department of Justice; United States Attorney General Office; United States Marshal Service; Federal Bureau of Investigation; United States Senators, Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein, personally and in their capacity as senators; State of California Commission on Judicial Performance; Governor…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.