Warren David Rose, Jr. v. Stephen Mayberg, Director, California Department of Mental Health

Good Law
454 F.3d 958·2006 WL 1984589·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 17997
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 18, 200605-16881California2,688 words

Opinion

Opinion

O'Scannlain, J.

We consider whether a habeas petition must be granted when a state court jury does not separately determine whether a sexually violent predator suffers from a mental condition that renders him dangerous beyond his control.

I

In 1982, Warren Rose — then serving in the United States Navy in Guam — committed violent sexual offenses against three eight-year-old girls. Rose was court-mart-ialed, pled guilty, and received a 13-year sentence in federal prison. He was paroled in 1990, having served seven years. Rose then violated the terms of his parole by contacting, hitting, and twice raping his ex-girlfriend. He was returned to federal prison for five years and was released in 1996. Less than a year later, Rose reof-fended, committing a lewd act on a seven-year-old girl he was babysitting. He was convicted in state court of committing a lewd and lascivious act upon a child under the age of 14 and was sentenced to a term of three years in state prison.

In 1999, the Sacramento County District Attorney’s Office filed a petition to commit Rose involuntarily as a sexually violent predator (“SVP”) pursuant to California’s Sexually Violent Predator Act (“SVPA”). See CAL. WELF. & INST. CODE…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.