Luis Franco-Rosendo Eulalia Zacarias De Franco v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General

Good Law
454 F.3d 965·2006 WL 1984595·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 17996
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 18, 200604-75173California1,305 words

Opinion

Opinion

Reinhardt, J.

Luis Franco-Rosendo and Eulalia Zaca-rías de Franco, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision of September 24, 2004, denying their motion to reopen. We grant their petition and remand to the BIA for further consideration.

The petitioners entered the United States from Mexico without inspection on or about April 25, 1990. They are married and currently reside in Reedley, California with their four United States citizen children. On December 3, 2001, the petitioners were issued a Notice to Appear. In the subsequent hearing, the couple conceded removability but requested cancellation of removal. The Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denied their request. The IJ’s decision was affirmed by the BIA on the ground that the couple failed to demonstrate that their United States citizen children would suffer “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship.” 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(D). The BIA instead granted voluntary departure.

By the time voluntary departure was granted, however, the female petitioner had become seriously ill. The couple failed to pay their departure bond and thus, they argue, effectively declined the offer of voluntary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.