Mobassa Boyd v. Anthony C. Newland, Warden

Good Law
455 F.3d 897·2006 WL 1728077·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 16032
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 26, 200603-17098California6,198 words

Opinion

Opinion

Graber, J.

ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION

ORDER

The Opinion filed on December 29, 2004, slip op. at 17513, and appearing at 393 F.3d 1008 (9th Cir.2004), is amended. The Amended Opinion will be filed contemporaneously with this Order.

With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc. Judges Graber and Fisher have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Cudahy has so recommended.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on it.

The petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. Further petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc may be filed.

OPINION

The California courts denied a Batson motion made by Petitioner Mobassa Boyd and denied his request for a free transcript of the entire voir dire for use on appeal. We must ask whether those rulings were contrary to, or unreasonably applied, clearly established federal law as determined by the Supreme Court. In an earlier decision in this case, we answered “no.” Boyd v. Newland, 393 F.3d 1008 (9th Cir.2004). In response to a petition for rehearing and in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.