Sentry Select Insurance Company v. Fidelity & Guaranty, Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company

Good Law
455 F.3d 956·2006 WL 1966656·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 17732
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 14, 200604-56265California643 words

Opinion

Opinion

ORDER CERTIFYING A QUESTION TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

ORDER

The panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit hereby certifies to the Supreme Court of California that this case contains a question concerning the law of California that is determinative of the cause and on which there is no clear controlling precedent in California’s judicial decisions. The panel therefore respectfully requests that the Supreme Court of California answer the certified question below and provides the following statement of facts and explanation:

Question Certified

What is the appropriate test for determining whether an insured is “engaged in the business of renting or leasing motor vehicles without operators ” under California Insurance Code § 11580.9(b)? Compare Travelers Indem. Co. of Ill. v. Md. Cas. Co., 41 Cal.App.4th 1538, 1546-47 , 49 Cal.Rptr.2d 271 (1996), and McCall v. Great Am. Ins. Co., 119 Cal.App.3d 993, 998 , 174 Cal.Rptr. 399 (1981), with W. Carriers Ins. Exch. v. Pac. Ins. Co., 211 Cal. App.3d 112, 116-17 , 259 Cal.Rptr. 36 (1989), Mission Ins. Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., 160 Cal.App.3d 97, 101 , 206 Cal.Rptr. 383 (1984), and Transp. Indem.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.