Chuck v. Hewlett Packard Co.

Caution
455 F.3d 1026·38 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1724·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 18579
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 25, 200604-36094California6,812 words

Opinion

Opinion

455 F.3d 1026 Kenneth CHUCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HEWLETT PACKARD CO., a foreign corporation; The Hewlett Packard Company Deferred Profit Sharing Retirement Plan; John Corcoran, in his capacity as the Plan Administrator; Jane and John Does, 1-10, in their capacity as Plan Administrators and/or Trustees, Defendants-Appellees. No. 04-36094. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted December 6, 2005. Filed July 25, 2006. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Karl G. Anuta and David S. Foster, of Sokol & Anuta, Portland, OR, for the plaintiff-appellant. Joseph P. Busch, III, of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Irvine, CA; and Richard F. Liebman and Allyson Krueger, of Barran Liebman, Portland, OR, for the defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; Anna J. Brown, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-03-01685-AJB. Before: D.W. NELSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges, and BURNS, * District Judge. D.W. NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge: 1 Kenneth Chuck appeals the district court's grant of the summary judgment motion put forward by several Hewlett Packard Company defendants (collectively, "HP").…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.