Hale v. Norton

Good Law
2006 D.A.R. 11·461 F.3d 1092·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 21699
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 200603-36032California2,735 words

Opinion

Opinion

461 F.3d 1092 Robert HALE; Joshua Hale; Nava S. Sunstar; Butterfly Sunstar, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gale NORTON, Secretary of the Interior; Gary Candelaria, Superintendent, Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve; Hunter Sharp, Chief Ranger, Wrangell-St. Elias National Park and Preserve; Department of the Interior; National Park Service; Fran Mainella, Director of the National Park Service; Marcia Blaszak, Acting Regional Director of the National Park Service; all in their official capacities, Defendants-Appellees, National Parks Conservation Association; The Wilderness Society; Alaska Center for the Environment, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees. No. 03-36032. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 12, 2005. Filed August 25, 2006. Russell C. Brooks and James S. Burling, Pacific Legal Foundation, Sacramento, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellants. Matthew J. Sanders, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the defendant-appellee. Robert W. Randall and Rebecca L. Bernard, Trustees for Alaska, Anchorage, AK, for the defendants-intervenors-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska; Ralph…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.