Syverson v. International Business Machines Corp.

Good Law
461 F.3d 1147·2006 WL 2506421·88 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,496·98 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1345·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 22504
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 31, 200604-16449California8,069 words

Opinion

Opinion

461 F.3d 1147 William SYVERSON, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated; Ruth Alice Boyd, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated; Dale Cahill, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated; Jack Friedman, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated; Paul Gromkowski, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated; Sylvia Jones, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated; Rolf No. 04-16449 Marsh, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated; Walter Maslak, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated; James Payne, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated; Antonio Rivera, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-counter-defendants-Appellants, v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, Defendant-counter-claimant-Appellee. No. 04-16449. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 4, 2006. Filed August 31, 2006. Jeffrey N. Young and Patrick N. McTeague, McTeague, Higbee, Case, Cohen, Whitney & Toker, Topsham, ME, for the appellants. Jeffrey D. Wohl and Katherine L. Kettler, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.