United States v. Eric Washington, United States of America v. Eric Washington

Good Law
462 F.3d 1124·2006 WL 2550041·71 Fed. R. Serv. 179·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 22681
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 6, 200604-50431, 04-50485California7,830 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hug, J.

On June 5, 2003, a jury convicted Eric Washington of violating 18 U.S.C. § 371 (conspiracy), 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113 (a), (d) (armed bank robbery), and 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c) (using, carrying, or possessing firearm in furtherance of crime of violence). On appeal, Washington contends that he is entitled to have his convictions reversed because: 1) the district court improperly admitted into evidence statements obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); 2) Washington was prejudiced when the judge admitted hearsay into evidence; and 3) Washington was prejudiced as a result of prosecutorial misconduct when the Government, in front of the jury, referred to his custodial status and to the judge’s ruling on a suppression motion.

On August 23, 2004, the district court sentenced Washington to seventy-seven months imprisonment for the conspiracy and armed bank robbery convictions. Washington appeals his sentence, claiming that it violated his Sixth Amendment rights. At the same time, the court also sentenced Washington to a five-year consecutive sentence for use of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c). The Government cross-appeals…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.