Chemical Producers and Distributors Ass'n v. Helliker

Good Law
463 F.3d 871·2006 WL 2506445·36 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20185·63 ERC (BNA) 1247·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 22505
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 31, 200604-56318California4,153 words

Opinion

Opinion

463 F.3d 871 CHEMICAL PRODUCERS AND DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paul E. HELLIKER, Director of the California Department of Pesticide Regulation, Defendant-Appellee, and Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.; Dow Agrosciences LLC; BASF Corporation; Bayer Cropscience LP; Du Pont De Nemours and Company; Monsanto Company, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees. No. 04-56318. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 4, 2006. Filed August 31, 2006. 1 COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED David H. Bamberger, DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary U.S. LLP, Washington, D.C., for the plaintiff-appellant. 2 Stanley W. Landfair and Lawrence S. Ebner, McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for the defendants-intervenors-appellees. 3 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; A. Howard Matz, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-02-09781-AHM. 4 Before HAWKINS and PAEZ, Circuit Judges, and NEIL V. WAKE, * District Judge. 5 WAKE, District Judge. 6 We must decide whether intervening amendments to California's pesticide registration laws, which were challenged and upheld below, render this appeal moot. We hold they do. Because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.