Bassiri v. Xerox Corp.

Good Law
463 F.3d 927·2006 WL 2598051·38 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2409·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 23187
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 12, 200604-55472California3,922 words

Opinion

Opinion

463 F.3d 927 Ali BASSIRI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. XEROX CORPORATION; Xerox Corporation Long-Term Disability Income Plan; Lawrence Becker, Defendants-Appellees, and Patricia Nazemetz; Prudential Company of America; Health International; Does 1-100 Inclusive, Defendants. No. 04-55472. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted December 5, 2005. Filed September 12, 2006. Kathleen A. Brewer, Westlake Village, CA, for the plaintiff-appellant. Richard J. Pautler, Thompson Colburn, LLP, St. Louis, MO, for the defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Dickran M. Tevrizian, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-03-03597-DT. Before PREGERSON, NOONAN, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. PREGERSON, Circuit Judge. 1 The district court determined that the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA") apply to Xerox's Long-Term Disability Plan ("LTD Plan") because the plan pays only 60% of Appellant Ali Bassiri's usual salary. Bassiri challenges that determination. The district court certified this issue for interlocutory appeal, and we thus have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (b).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.