Mose Stephens, Jr., A/K/A Steve M. Stephens v. Al Herrera, Warden United States of America

Bad Law
464 F.3d 895·2006 WL 2613714·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 23290
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 13, 200604-56232California1,969 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fletcher, J.

Petitioner-appellant Mose Stephens appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition for lack of jurisdiction. Stephens argues that because the remedy provided by 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is “inadequate or ineffective” to test his claim of “actual innocence” based on Richardson v. United States, 526 U.S. 813 , 119 S.Ct. 1707 , 143 L.Ed.2d 985 (1999), the district court may entertain his § 2241 petition. We conclude that Stephens has not made a sufficient showing of actual innocence within the meaning of Bousley v. United States, 523 U.S. 614, 623 , 118 S.Ct. 1604 , 140 L.Ed.2d 828 (1998). We therefore affirm the district court’s dismissal of Stephens’s § 2241 petition.

I. Background

In 1987, after a jury trial in federal district court in Oklahoma, Stephens was convicted of (1) conspiring to possess and distribute heroin and cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 , (2) conspiring to impede and impair the collection of federal income taxes in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 , and (3) engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 848 . Stephens was sentenced to forty years in prison. In 1988, his conviction was affirmed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.