United States v. David Martinez-Rodriguez

Good Law
468 F.3d 1182·2006 WL 3360504·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 28844
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 21, 200605-50719California3,598 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gould, J.

A jury convicted David Martinez-Rodriguez (“Martinez”) of re-entering the United States after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a). On August 23, 2005, the district court sentenced Martinez to seventy-seven months imprisonment with three years supervised release. Martinez challenges his sentence on two grounds.

First, relying on our decision in United States v. Covian-Sandoval, 462 F.3d 1090 (9th Cir.2006), and the Supreme Court’s decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), Martinez argues that the district court improperly found that his prior removal “was subsequent to a conviction for commission of an aggravated felony,” § 1326(b)(2). Martinez argues that he never admitted this fact, nor was this fact ever proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. The district court relied on Martinez’s prior removal subsequent to his aggravated felony conviction to increase his statutory-maximum sentence from two to twenty years under § 1326(b)(2).

Second, Martinez argues that the district court erred in finding that his prior conviction for possession of marijuana for sale under California Health and Safety Code section 11359 was a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.