Pit River Tribe v. United States Forest Service

Good Law
469 F.3d 768·36 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20223·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 27385
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 6, 200604-15746California9,332 words

Opinion

Opinion

469 F.3d 768 PIT RIVER TRIBE; Native Coalition for Medicine Lake Highlands Defense; Mount Shasta Bioregional Ecology Center, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; Advisory Council on Historic Preservation; United States Bureau of Land Management; Calpine Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 04-15746. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 14, 2006. Filed November 6, 2006. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Deborah A. Sivas, Earthjustice, Stanford, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellants. Thomas L. Sansonetti, Andrew Mergen, Todd S. Aagaard, Andrea L. Berlowe, Dep't of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the defendants-appellees. Robert A. Maynard, Richard W. Oehler, Perkins Coie LLP, Boise, ID, for defendant-appellee Calpine Corporation. Stephan C. Volker, Joshua A.H. Harris, Marnie E. Riddle, Law Offices of Stephan C. Volker, Oakland, CA, for Amici Curiae Save Medicine Lake Coalition, Medicine Lake Citizens for Quality Environment, Fall River Wild Trout Foundation, Klamath Forest Alliance, and California Wilderness Coalition in support of appellants. Appeal from the United States District…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.