Victor Manuel Renderos v. Stuart Ryan, Warden, California State Prison, Calipatria

Good Law
469 F.3d 788·2006 WL 3209988·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 27559
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 8, 200605-16454California4,445 words

Opinion

Opinion

Siler, J.

Petitioner Victor Renderos appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Because Renderos identifies no “clearly established federal law” that was misapplied or violated by the California Court of Appeal, and does not contend that there was an unreasonable determination of the facts, we deny the petition.

I.

Renderos dated Lisa C. during the early 1990s. She had two sons, Ryan and Jordan, both of whom were under 14 years old. Renderos spent a lot of time with Lisa and her sons, and Ryan thought of Renderos as a father. However, the relationship ended after a few years, sometime in the mid 1990s.

When Ryan was seventeen, he told his mother that Renderos had sexually molested him. He had not previously said anything to his mother because the incidents made him feel “gay” and he feared he would get in trouble. On March 19, 2001, Ryan reported the abuse to the police. One month later, investigators taped two telephone conversations between Ryan and Renderos. Ryan asked Renderos whether he remembered the molestations and asked why Renderos had molested him. Ryan reminded Renderos about an incident that had occurred on a canoeing trip and asked why Renderos had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.