Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Veneman

Bad Law
469 F.3d 826·2006 WL 3375347·36 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20232·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 29011
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 22, 200604-15788California14,696 words

Opinion

Opinion

469 F.3d 826 ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND; Animal Welfare Institute; Valerie Buchanan; Jane Garrison; Nancy Megna, Plaintiffs-Appellants, National Association for Biomedical Research, Intervenor-Appellee, v. Ann M. VENEMAN; Bobby R. Acord; Chester A. Gipson, Defendants-Appellees. No. 04-15788. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted December 9, 2005. Filed November 22, 2006. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Katherine A. Meyer, Howard M. Crystal, Meyer, Glitzenstein & Crystal, Washington, D.C.; Bruce A. Wagman, Morgenstein & Jubelirer, San Francisco, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellants. Robert A. Long, Covington & Burling, Washington, D.C., for the intervenor-appellee. John S. Koppel, Michael Jay Singer, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Phyllis J. Hamilton, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-03-03400-PJH. Before KOZINSKI and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and H. RUSSEL HOLLAND, * District Judge. WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge. 1 Plaintiffs, who include the Animal Legal Defense Fund ("ALDF"), the Animal Welfare…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.