Daniel Skoog v. County of Clackamas Mark Fresh, and Herbert Royster, Daniel Skoog v. County of Clackamas Mark Fresh Herbert Royster, Daniel Skoog v. County of Clackamas, and Mark Fresh Herbert Royster

469 F.3d 1221 Daniel SKOOG, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. COUNTY OF CLACKAMAS; Mark Fresh, Defendants, and Herbert Royster, Defendant-Appellant. Daniel Skoog, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. County of Clackamas; Mark Fresh; Herbert Royster, Defendants-Appellees. Daniel Skoog, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. County of Clackamas, Defendant-Appellee, and Mark Fresh; Herbert Royster, Defendants. No. 04-35087. No. 04-35286. No. 04-35568. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 9, 2006. Filed November 20, 2006. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Montomery W. Cobb, Cobb & Bosse, LLP, Portland, OR, for plaintiff-appellant-appellee Daniel Skoog. Rolf C. Moan, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, OR, for defendant-appellant-appellee Herbert Royster. Edward S. McGlone, Assistant County Counsel, Clackamas County, Oregon City, OR, for defendant-appellee County of Clackamas. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-00-01733-MWM. Before BRUNETTI, T.G. NELSON, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge. I. Introduction 1 This set of appeals arises from a single lawsuit that is still ongoing.…