United States v. James H. Tuff

Good Law
469 F.3d 1249·2006 WL 3478343·39 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1950·98 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 7975·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 29665
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 4, 200605-35195California3,696 words

Opinion

Opinion

Goodwin, J.

James H. Tuff (“Tuff’) appeals the summary judgment granted the United States in its action to recover $208,513.20 refunded to Tuff by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) in connection with stock options Tuff exercised in 1999 through a margin loan from Morgan Stanley. We affirm the judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

The appeal turns on whether Tuff received income in the form of shares of stock when he exercised his options, or when Morgan Stanley liquidated the shares after their value had declined.

The material facts are not in dispute. Tuff was employed by RealNetworks, Inc., at a management level, and was classified as a corporate insider who could sell Real-Networks shares only during open trading windows approved by the company. As part of his compensation package Tuff received stock options, which he exercised twice in 1999 to purchase RealNetworks shares that had a total market value at the time of purchase of $460,093.75. The exercise, or “strike,” price of these shares was $6,137.00, making the difference, or spread, between their market value and exercise price $453,956.75.

Tuff financed these purchases by borrowing from Morgan Stanley, writing checks to RealNetworks from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.