United States v. Keith E. Anderson

Good Law
472 F.3d 662·2006 WL 3803167·98 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 8369·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 31920
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 28, 200605-30211California3,957 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thompson, J.

Defendant-Appellant Keith E. Anderson appeals his convictions and sentence for conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, aiding and assisting the filing of materially false income tax returns, mail fraud, wire fraud, conspiracy to commit money laundering, and international money laundering. Anderson received a sentence of twenty years in prison, three years of supervised release, and monetary penalties.

Anderson contends that his convictions and sentence should be reversed because his appeal of the annulment of his Costa Rican citizenship was pending in Costa Rica when he was extradited to the United States to stand trial for the above-listed offenses. Therefore, he asserts the district court lacked personal jurisdiction over him.

Anderson also argues for the first time in his reply brief filed in this Court that his convictions for money laundering and conspiracy to commit money laundering should be vacated under the doctrines of dual criminality and specialty because the Costa Rican court specifically held that the money laundering offenses did not satisfy the terms of the extradition treaty and refused to grant the United States’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.