United States v. Esteban Hernandez-Castro

Good Law
473 F.3d 1004·2007 WL 79532·2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 666
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 12, 200706-10074California1,503 words

Opinion

Opinion

McKEOWN, J.

Under 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (f), known as the “safety valve” provision, a defendant may be sentenced below the applicable statutory minimum if certain conditions are met, including not having “more than 1 criminal history point, as determined under the sentencing guidelines.” Id. § 3553(f)(1). The issue we consider is whether, following the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), the United States Sentencing Guidelines are advisory for purposes of calculating criminal history points under § 3553(f)(1).

This is an issue of first impression in this circuit and we join our sister circuits in holding that Booker left intact the requirement of § 3553(f)(1) that a defendant “not have more than 1 criminal history point.” Section 3553(f)(1) is not, by virtue of its reference to the Sentencing Guidelines, rendered advisory by Booker. See United States v. McKoy, 452 F.3d 234, 239 (3d Cir.2006); United States v. Brehm, 442 F.3d 1291, 1300 (11th Cir.2006); United States v. Barrero, 425 F.3d 154, 157-58 (2d Cir.2005); United States v. Bermudez, 407 F.3d 536, 544-45 (1st Cir.2005); see also United States v. Payton, 405 F.3d 1168 ,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.