Public Utilities Commission of the State of California California Electric Oversight Board, Pacific Gas and Electric Company Nevada Power Company Southern California Edison Co. ("Edison") Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles, Public Service Department of the City of Burbank, Public Service Department of the City of Glendale, and Water and Power Department of the City of Pasadena (Collectively "Ladwp") Sempra Energy Mirant Americas Energy Marketing, L.P. Coral Power Ppm Energy Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, Washington Dynegy Power Marketing Inc., Intervenors v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, California Electric Oversight Board California Public Utilities Commission, Nevada Power Company Southern California Edison Co. ("Edison") Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles, Public Service Department of the City of Burbank, Public Service Department of the City of Glendale, and Water and Power Department of the City of Pasadena (Collectively "Ladwp") Sempra Energy Mirant Americas Energy Marketing, L.P. Ppm Energy Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, Washington Dynegy Power Marketing Inc., Intervenors v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Good Law

474 F.3d 587·2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 31140

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 19, 200603-74207California4,589 words

Opinion

474 F.3d 587 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA; California Electric Oversight Board, Petitioners, Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Nevada Power Company; Southern California Edison Co. ("Edison"); Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles, Public Service Department of the City of Burbank, Public Service Department of the City of Glendale, and Water and Power Department of the City of Pasadena (Collectively "LADWP, et al."); Sempra Energy; Mirant Americas Energy Marketing, L.P.; Coral Power; PPM Energy; Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, Washington; Dynegy Power Marketing Inc., Intervenors, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent. California Electric Oversight Board; California Public Utilities Commission, Petitioners, Nevada Power Company; Southern California Edison Co. ("Edison"); Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles, Public Service Department of the City of Burbank, Public Service Department of the City of Glendale, and Water and Power Department of the City of Pasadena (Collectively "LADWP, et al."); Sempra Energy; Mirant Americas Energy Marketing, L.P.; PPM Energy; Public Utility District No. 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.

Parties

Public Utilities Commission of the State of California California Electric Oversight Board, Pacific Gas and Electric Company Nevada Power Company Southern California Edison Co. Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles, Public Service Department of the City of Burbank, Public Service Department of the City of Glendale, and Water and Power Department of the City of Pasadena Sempra Energy Mirant Americas Energy Marketing, L.P. Coral Power Ppm Energy Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, Washington Dynegy Power Marketing Inc., Intervenors
Plaintiff
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, California Electric Oversight Board California Public Utilities Commission, Nevada Power Company Southern California Edison Co. Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles, Public Service Department of the City of Burbank, Public Service Department of the City of Glendale, and Water and Power Department of the City of Pasadena Sempra Energy Mirant Americas Energy Marketing, L.P. Ppm Energy Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, Washington Dynegy Power Marketing Inc., Intervenors v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Defendant

Cites (5)

474 F.3d 587
201 F.3d 1186
341 F.3d 906
350 U.S. 332
350 U.S. 348