Jose Alberto Valeriano v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General

Bad Law
474 F.3d 669·2007 WL 150476
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 23, 200703-72277, 03-74754California2,620 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kleinfeld, J.

We decide that an alien who delays filing a motion to reopen under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(1) while awaiting the government’s response to his counsel’s request to join the motion to reopen under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(3)(iii) until the deadline is past is not entitled to equitable tolling.

Facts

Valeriano is a 34-year-old native and citizen of Mexico with three United States citizen children. He entered the United States on June 25, 1988, and has resided here continuously since that time. Nine years after Valeriano got here, in February 1997, the INS served an Order to Show Cause why he was not deportable. An Immigration Judge found him deporta-ble as charged and granted him voluntary departure in 1999. Valeriano appealed, but his appeal was filed six days late, so the BIA deemed it untimely.

That is where our case begins. Valeri-ano filed a motion to reconsider, accompa nied by a declaration from a person who states that she is a paralegal at Valeriano’s lawyer’s office. She says that she sent Valeriano’s notice of appeal by FedEx December 13, and that it was delivered December 14, which would be timely. But as proof she attached documents that prove the opposite of what she…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.