Stephanie-Cardona LLC v. Smith's Food and Drug Centers, Inc., Stephanie-Cardona LLC v. Smith's Food and Drug Centers, Inc.

Good Law
476 F.3d 701·67 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 510·2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 2543
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 6, 200705-15360, 05-15543California2,023 words

Opinion

Opinion

Goodwin, J.

This appeal and cross-appeal grew out of a contract dispute between Stephanie-Car-dona, LLC (“Stephanie-Cardona”), a real estate development firm, and Smith’s Food & Drug Centers, Inc. (“Smith’s”), a grocery store operator. Stephanie-Cardona appeals a summary judgment in favor of Smith’s, and the cross-appeal challenges the denial of Smith’s request for attorney’s fees and costs. Because Stephanie-Cardo-na’s notice of appeal was untimely, we dismiss both the appeal and the cross-appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

I. Procedural History

Stephanie-Cardona sold a lot in a shopping center development to Smith’s, with the expectation that Smith’s would build and operate an anchor grocery store on the site. After spending over $3 million, Smith’s abandoned the grocery store project as a business decision. Stephanie-Cardona sued, alleging that Smith’s withdrawal was a breach of contract that forced Stephanie-Cardona into bankruptcy-

Stephanie-Cardona’s action filed in Nevada state court was removed on diversity grounds to federal court in June 2002. Stephanie-Cardona’s first amended complaint alleged six causes of action sounding in contract, unjust enrichment, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.