United States v. Hagop Vartanian

Good Law
476 F.3d 1095·2007 WL 601989·99 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1245·2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 4414
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 28, 200705-10581California2,103 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bybee, J.

Hagop Vartanian (“Vartanian”) appeals his jury convictions for aiding and abetting the filing of a false tax return, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 26 U.S.C. § 7206 (1), and two counts of aiding and abetting the making of false statements on a loan application, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 18 U.S.C. § 1014 . On appeal, Vartanian asserts that the district court abused its discretion when it dismissed a juror from service. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm Vartanian’s conviction.

I

In November 2001, a grand jury returned an indictment charging Vartanian with understating the income from his auto sales business, Pacific Sales & Leasing, on his 1994 and 1995 tax returns; with deliberately omitting income from his business, Muscles-N-Motion; and with deliberately omitting income from his illegal bookmaking business. The indictment also charged Vartanian with knowingly making false statements on his 1993 and 1994 tax return for the purpose of obtaining a car loan.

Vartanian’s trial began in February 2003, and the jury began deliberations in March 2003. On the second day of deliberations, the trial judge received a note from the jury foreperson…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.