Anup Engquist v. Oregon Department of Agriculture Joseph (Jeff) Hyatt John Szczepanski, Anup Engquist v. Oregon Department of Agriculture Joseph (Jeff) Hyatt John Szczepanski

Good Law
478 F.3d 985·25 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1025·32 A.L.R. 6th 795·72 Fed. R. Serv. 483·90 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,066
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 8, 200705-35170California15,355 words

Opinion

Opinion

478 F.3d 985 Anup ENGQUIST, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; Joseph (Jeff) Hyatt; John Szczepanski, Defendants-Appellants. Anup Engquist, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Oregon Department of Agriculture; Joseph (Jeff) Hyatt; John Szczepanski, Defendants-Appellees. No. 05-35170. No. 05-35263. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 27, 2006. Filed February 8, 2007. Loren W. Collins, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Julie A. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Oregon Department of Justice, Salem, OR, for defendants-appellants and cross-appellees. Stephen L. Brischetto, Portland, OR, for plaintiff-appellee and cross-appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; Donald C. Ashmanskas, Magistrate Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV 02-1637 AS. Before: REINHARDT, TASHIMA, and GRABER, Circuit Judges. TASHIMA, Circuit Judge: 1 Plaintiff Anup Engquist ("Engquist") brought suit alleging violations of federal anti-discrimination law, constitutional law, and state tort law against her former employer, the Oregon Department of Agriculture ("ODA") and John Szczepanski ("Szczepanski") and Joseph Hyatt…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.