Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P. v. County of San Diego

Good Law
479 F.3d 1061·2007 WL 738493·40 Communications Reg. (P&F) 818·2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 5753
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 13, 200705-56076California9,595 words

Opinion

Opinion

479 F.3d 1061 SPRINT TELEPHONY PCS, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, and Pacific Bell Wireless LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, dba Cingular Wireless, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; Greg Cox, in his capacity as supervisor of the County of San Diego; Dianne Jacob, in her capacity as supervisor of the County of San Diego; Pam Slater, in her capacity as supervisor of the County of San Diego; Ron Roberts, in his capacity as supervisor of the County of San Diego; Bill Horn, in his capacity as supervisor of the County of San Diego, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants. No. 05-56076. No. 05-56435. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 26, 2006. Filed March 13, 2007. Daniel T. Pascucci, Andrew D. Skale, and Nathan R. Hamler, Buchanan Ingersoll LLP, San Diego, CA, for plaintiff-appellant-cross-appellee. Thomas D. Bunton and John Sansome, County of San Diego Office of County Counsel, San Diego, CA, for defendants-appellees-cross-appellants. Edward L. Donohue, argued, Donohue & Blue PLC, Alexandria, VA, for Amici Curiae T Mobile USA, Inc. and PCIA, the Wireless Infrastructure Association. Appeals…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.