Crst Van Expedited, Inc. v. Werner Enterprises, Inc., Doing Business in California as C.L. Werner, Inc., Crst Van Expedited, Inc. v. Werner Enterprises, Inc., Doing Business in California as C.L. Werner, Inc.

Good Law
479 F.3d 1099·25 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1393·2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 5944
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 15, 200704-56809California6,688 words

Opinion

Opinion

479 F.3d 1099 CRST VAN EXPEDITED, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC., doing business in California as C.L. Werner, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. CRST VAN EXPEDITED, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC., doing business in California as C.L. Werner, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. No. 04-56809. No. 04-57129. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 23, 2006. Filed March 15, 2007. Barry Levenstam, Jenner & Block LLP, Chicago, IL, for the appellant; Scott T. Schutte and Kathy A. Karcher, Jenner & Block LLP, Chicago, IL, were on the briefs. Robert M. Waxman, Ervin, Cohen & Jessup LLP, Beverly Hills, CA, for the appellee. Andres Quintana, Ervin, Cohen & Jessup LLP, Beverly Hills, CA, was on the brief. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Manuel L. Real, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-04-04676-R. Before A. WALLACE TASHIMA, CARLOS T. BEA, and SANDRA S. IKUTA, Circuit Judges. BEA, Circuit Judge. 1 This case calls on us to decide whether, under California law, a corporation's allegations that its competitor lured away employees who had signed employment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.