San Francisco Baykeeper Citizens Committee to Complete the Refuge Michael R. Lozeau v. Cargill Salt Division Cargill Inc., San Francisco Baykeeper Citizens Committee to Complete the Refuge, and Michael R. Lozeau v. Cargill Salt Division Cargill Inc.

Good Law
481 F.3d 700·37 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20061·64 ERC (BNA) 1109·2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 5442
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 8, 200705-15051California5,066 words

Opinion

Opinion

481 F.3d 700 SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER; Citizens Committee to Complete the Refuge; Michael R. Lozeau, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CARGILL SALT DIVISION; Cargill Inc., Defendants-Appellants. San Francisco Baykeeper; Citizens Committee to Complete the Refuge, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Michael R. Lozeau, Plaintiff, v. Cargill Salt Division; Cargill Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 04-17554. No. 05-15051. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted September 27, 2006. Filed March 8, 2007. John F. Barg, Barg, Coffin, Lewis & Trapp, LLP, San Francisco, CA; Sandi L. Nichols, Stoel Rives LLP, San Francisco, CA, for the defendants-appellants-cross-appellees. Daniel Purcell, Keker & Van Nest, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellees-cross-appellants. Gregory T. Broderick, Pacific Legal Foundation, Sacramento, CA; Scott M. DuBoff, Wright & Talisman, PC, Washington, D.C.; Virginia S. Albrecht, Hunton & Williams, LLP, Washington, D.C.; James Murphy, National Wildlife Federation, Montpelier, VT; Katherine J. Barton, United States Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division, Washington, D.C., for the amici curiae. Appeal from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.