Celcom v. At&t Wireless Services, Inc.

Good Law
481 F.3d 1138
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 7, 200705-35567California2,673 words

Opinion

Opinion

481 F.3d 1138 J&J CELCOM; Lupe Azevedo; Woodrow W. Holmes, Jr.; Lucille Hoss; Daniel Murray; Rajive Oberoi; Kenneth L. Ramsey; Gary R. Robbins; Joanne Robbins; S & D Partnership; Cell-Cal IX-T9; Nancy Donnelly; Rodger D. Friz; Sid Danny Hoff; Om Parkash Kalra; Ronald Wilson; Delchi Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES, INC.; McCaw Cellular Interests Inc.; AT&T Wireless Services of Colorado LLC; AT&T Wireless Services of Idaho Inc.; AT&T Wireless Services of Washington LLC; Boise City Cellular Partnership, formerly known as New Boise City Cellular Partnership; Fort Collins-Loveland Cellular Telephone Co., formerly known as New Fort Collins-Loveland Cellular Telephone Company; Greeley Cellular Co., formerly known as New Greeley Cellular Company; Yakima Cellular Telephone Company, Formerly Knowna As New Yakima Cellular Telephone Company; McCaw Communications of Wheeling, Inc.; McCaw Communications of Texarkana, Inc.; AT&T Wireless Services of California, Defendants-Appellees. No. 05-35567. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 7, 2007. John Oitzinger, Helena, Montana, Thomas W. Hayton, Robert G. Nylander, Philip…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.