Rudolph Intern., Inc. v. Realys, Inc.

Good Law
482 F.3d 1195·2007 WL 1077176·82 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1375·2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 8386
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 12, 200705-55605California1,709 words

Opinion

Opinion

482 F.3d 1195 RUDOLPH INTERNATIONAL, INC., a California corporation, d/b/a Soft Touch Professional Beauty Products, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REALYS, INC., a California corporation, a/k/a Tropical Shine; Michael Falley, individually and as alter ego of Realys, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 05-55605. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 5, 2007. Filed April 12, 2007. Lawrence E. Heller, Heller & Edwards, Beverly Hills, CA, for the plaintiff-appellant. Darrell L. Olson, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, Irvine, CA, and Valerie L. Kramer, Heinly, Benson, Killian & Kramer, Tustin, California, for the defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Alicemarie H. Stotler, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-03-01247-AHS. Before BEEZER and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges, and THELTON E. HENDERSON, * District Judge. BEEZER, Circuit Judge. 1 In this trademark infringement case, Plaintiff Rudolph International, Inc. ("Rudolph") appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment to Defendant Realys, Inc. ("Realys"). The district court held that the mark "disinfectable" is generic in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.