Hoa Hong Van v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Good Law
483 F.3d 600·120 Soc. Serv. Rev. 128·2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 4142
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 26, 200704-56424California6,813 words

Opinion

Opinion

Reinhardt, J.

I

Hoa Hong Van, a successful claimant for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits, appeals the district court’s denial of her application for attorneys’ fees as time-barred by the filing provision in the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA” or “the Act”), which requires a party to submit a fee application “within thirty days of final judgment in the action,” 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d)(1)(B), and defines “final judgment” as “a judgment that is final and not appealable....” Id. § 2412(d)(2)(G). The district court held that because, following a remand under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g), the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) consented to a judgment enforcing the agency’s determination in favor of Van, the judgment became “final and not appealable” immediately, requiring Van to file her fee application within 30 days after entry of judgment, rather than 30 days after expiration of the 60-day appeal period provided for in Rule 4(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Because Van filed her fee application 62 days after entry of judgment, the district court denied her application as untimely. Id.

In this case, we consider whether in order to be deemed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.