Nora Luz Serrato v. Schelia A. Clark Harley G. Lappin

Bad Law
486 F.3d 560·2007 WL 1344024·2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 10920
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 9, 200706-15167California5,017 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bea, J.

We are called upon to decide whether the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) improperly terminated its early-release correctional program for penal inmates known variously as the shock incarceration program, intensive confinement center or ICC program, and boot camp (hereinafter, “boot camp”). Boot camp was established to provide a highly regimented schedule with strict discipline and physical training for inmates. By promoting personal development, self-control, and discipline, the program aimed to reduce recidivism and control prison populations and costs. Upon successful completion of the program, inmates were eligible to have BOP reduce their sentence by up to six months. In 2004, citing budgetary constraints and a study which showed the program ineffective to reduce recidivism, BOP terminated the program.

Before the boot camp program was terminated, Nora Luz Serrato pleaded guilty to, and was convicted of, possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute. Serrato wanted to attend boot camp. At sentencing, the judge recommended that Serrato be placed in the program. BOP informed the judge that Serrato’s initial sentence was too long for her to be placed directly in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.