In Re Carla Freeman, Carla Freeman v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General Michael Chertoff William McNamee Joe Meisenheimer, Real Parties in Interest

Good Law
489 F.3d 966·2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12362
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 29, 200706-75539California1,172 words

Opinion

Opinion

489 F.3d 966 In re Carla FREEMAN, Carla Freeman, Petitioner, v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Respondent, Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General; Michael Chertoff; William McNamee; Joe Meisenheimer, Real Parties in Interest. No. 06-75539. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Filed May 29, 2007. Brent W. Renison, Parrilli Renison, LLC, Lake Oswego, OR, for Petitioner. Kenneth C. Bauman, USPO — Office of the U.S. Attorney Mark O. Hatfield, Portland, OR, Carl H. McIntyre, Jr., Francis W. Fraser, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Real Parties in Interest. Petition for Writ of Mandamus. D.C. No. CV-04-00666-OMP, Before: RAYMOND C. FISHER, RONALD M. GOULD and CARLOS T. BEA, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 In Freeman v. Gonzales, 444 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir.2006), we decided that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) erred in two respects in refusing to adjudicate Carla Freeman's application for adjustment of status. First, we decided that DHS was incorrect that entry into the United States through the Visa Waiver Program (VWP) precluded Freeman from availing herself of the procedural…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.