Sprint Telephony Pcs, L.P. v. County Of San Diego

Good Law
490 F.3d 700·2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 13811
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 13, 200705-56076California9,828 words

Opinion

Opinion

490 F.3d 700 SPRINT TELEPHONY PCS, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, and Pacific Bell Wireless LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, d/b/a Cingular Wireless, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; Greg Cox, in his capacity as supervisor of the County of San Diego; Dianne Jacob, in her capacity as supervisor of the County of San Diego; Pam Slater, in her capacity as supervisor of the County of San Diego; Ron Roberts, in his capacity as supervisor of the County of San Diego; Bill Horn, in his capacity as supervisor of the County of San Diego, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants. No. 05-56076. No. 05-56435. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 26, 2006. Filed March 13, 2007. Amended June 13, 2007. Daniel T. Pascucci, Andrew D. Skale, Nathan R. Hamler, Buchanan Ingersoll LLP, San Diego, CA, for the plaintiff-appellant-cross-appellee. Thomas D. Bunton, John Sansome, County of San Diego Office of County Counsel, San Diego, CA, for the defendants-appellees-cross-appellants. Dennis J. Herrera, San Francisco City Attorney, Theresa L. Mueller, Chief Energy & Telecommunications Deputy, Danny Y. Chou, Chief…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.