Daniel Kingoo v. Eric Holder, Jr.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 19, 201209-71203California276 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 19 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DANIEL MAINGI KINGOO, No. 09-71203
Petitioner, Agency No. A097-102-876
v.
MEMORANDUM *
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 17, 2012 **
Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Daniel Maingi Kingoo, a native and citizen of Kenya, petitions pro se for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal
from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his motion to reopen
proceedings based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s decision,