Daniel Kingoo v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 19, 201209-71203California276 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 19 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL MAINGI KINGOO, No. 09-71203

Petitioner, Agency No. A097-102-876

v.

MEMORANDUM *

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 17, 2012 **

Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Daniel Maingi Kingoo, a native and citizen of Kenya, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal

from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his motion to reopen

proceedings based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s decision,

Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.