David Dodd v. Unknown Parties

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 26, 201200-16752California246 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 26 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID JAMES DODD, No. 11-15283

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:10-cv-02566-RCB-

ECV

v.

UNKNOWN PARTIES, C.O. and C.O. II; MEMORANDUM * et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Robert C. Broomfield, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 17, 2012 **

Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

David James Dodd, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

district court’s order dismissing as time-barred his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action

alleging deliberate indifference to his safety. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1291. We review de novo, Jones v. Blanas, 393 F.3d 918, 926 (9th Cir. 2004),

and we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.