United States v. Michael Shinefield

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 201210-50386California876 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 16 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-50386

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:08-cr-01310-ODW-

v.

MEMORANDUM *

MICHAEL LOUIS SHINEFIELD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Otis D. Wright II, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 8, 2012 ** Pasadena, California

Before: D.W. NELSON, FISHER, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Michael Louis Shinefield appeals the sentence imposed by the district court

following his guilty plea to wire fraud, aiding and abetting, and causing an act to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). be done, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 2. We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a), and we affirm.

1. The district court did…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.