United States v. Michael Shinefield
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 201210-50386California876 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 16 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-50386
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:08-cr-01310-ODW-
v.
MEMORANDUM *
MICHAEL LOUIS SHINEFIELD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Otis D. Wright II, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 8, 2012 ** Pasadena, California
Before: D.W. NELSON, FISHER, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Michael Louis Shinefield appeals the sentence imposed by the district court
following his guilty plea to wire fraud, aiding and abetting, and causing an act to
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). be done, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 2. We have jurisdiction under
U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a), and we affirm.
1. The district court did…