United States v. Randy Jangula

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 18, 201211-30334California203 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 18 2012

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 11-30334 11-30335 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. Nos. 4:02-cr-00048-SEH v. 4:03-cr-00038-SEH

RANDY JAMES JANGULA,

Defendant - Appellant. MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 15, 2012 **

Before: CANBY, GRABER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated cases, Randy James Jangula appeals from the

consecutive 12-month sentences imposed following revocation of supervised

release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Jangula contends that his aggregate sentence is substantively unreasonable.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.