United States v. Daniel Salazar
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 21, 201211-50106California263 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 21 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-50106
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:10-cr-03984-WQH
v.
MEMORANDUM *
DANIEL JOSEPH SALAZAR,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 15, 2012 **
Before: CANBY, GRABER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Daniel Joseph Salazar appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed
following his guilty-plea conviction for importation of cocaine, in violation of
U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). affirm.
Salazar contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to
appreciate its discretion under Kimbrough v.…