United States v. Jesus Mendoza-Sosa

Good Law
478 F. App'x 388
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 21, 201211-10296California308 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Jesus Mendoza-Sosa appeals from the 51-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Mendoza-Sosa first contends that the district court procedurally erred by considering information in the presentence report that lacked the required indicia of reliability. The record reflects that the district court sustained Mendoza-Sosa’s objection to the inclusion of the challenged information and did not consider this information in imposing Mendoza-Sosa’s sentence.

Mendoza-Sosa also contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to consider or address adequately his arguments for a departure for cultural assimilation under Application Note 8 to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2, a departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0(c), and a variance under 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a). The record reflects that the district court followed the proper sentencing procedures. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 991-92 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc). It properly considered, but disagreed with, Mendoza-Sosa’s contention that a lower custodial sentence was warranted. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.