United States v. Miguel Garcia-Amesquita

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 21, 201211-10212California268 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 21 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10212

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:10-cr-02407-RCC

v.

MEMORANDUM *

MIGUEL ANGEL GARCIA-

AMESQUITA, a.k.a. Juan Tomas Arias- Rivas, a.k.a. Miguel Angel Garcia- Amesguita,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 15, 2012 **

Before: CANBY, GRABER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Miguel Angel Garcia-Amesquita appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and

18-month sentence for re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Garcia-Amesquita’s

counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.