Amarjit Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
473 F. App'x 689
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 24, 201209-73422California307 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Cesar Augusto Ambrocio, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence factual findings, including the agency’s adverse credibility findings. Cortez-Pineda v. Holder, 610 F.3d 1118, 1124 (9th Cir.2010). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination on the basis of inconsistencies in Ambrocio’s testimony regarding when he received the threatening letters and on the basis of the omission of his union activities from his asylum application and interview. See id. at 1124 (inconsistency regarding when petitioner received threats); Husyev v. Mukasey, 528 F.3d 1172, 1183 (9th Cir.2008) (omission of political activism from petitioner’s application and interview). Further, Ambrocio’s explanations of the inconsistencies and omission do not compel a contrary result. See Zamanov v. Holder, 649 F.3d 969, 974…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.